Recently, Ling, a student at the University of Melbourne, asked me to participate in a study for a final thesis on food blogs and food media. Ling's last question was:
> Have you come across instances of developed-nation superiority,
> cultural ignorance or other 'ugly blogging' behaviour (veiled,
> unconscious, implied or otherwise)? How do you think readers and
> bloggers can deal with, or be protected against these occurrences?
I basically said that I don't go googling for culturally ignorant sluts, so I don't really come into contact with that particular brand of idiocy.
But lookie lookie what a precious present we gets on Wednesday morning. Frank Bruni's review of Yumcha starts out by sympathizing with the plight of Chinese cuisine:
"Like private school admissions, the Tony Awards and Judge Judy, the New York restaurant scene isn't entirely fair, and the first cuisine to tell you that would be Chinese."
Poor, poor Chinese food, always being carted around on bikes, always the ugly bigfoot stepsister. Frank sees your plight. Frank knows what you're going through.
But then he says:
"You won't find any of those dishes at Yumcha, which takes on the challenge of casting Chinese in a softer, subtler, more elegant light."
As though it were really a task to make Chinese seem elegant. But wait! Not only is Chinese inelegant, it's downright dirty. How about a little exotic erotic, Suzie Wong style?
"If you sense in those descriptions a blurring of boundaries - a sort of pan-Asian embrace coupled with a French kiss - you understand Yumcha's wiles. It christens its come-on "modern haute Chinese," the first and second words of which signal that this restaurant isn't exactly pledging greater ethnic authenticity than your corner supplier of salt-and-pepper prawns." [emphasis mine]
His final condescension is the best part:
"At Yumcha, Chinese is relieved of its bicycle, put into a limo and squired to the prom, where it sashays onto the dance floor, giddy and resplendent, and cannot figure out precisely how to twirl."
Um. HELLO?!!! Are all the editors at the NYT on leave or on crack? I canNOT believe they let this shit run.
At best, it's an extremely clunky metaphor (like all of his o-v-e-r-e-x-t-e-n-d-e-d metaphors). But at worst, I think this may be an example of the developed nation superiority and cultural imperialism you're looking to write about, Ling. Are you taking notes?
****
Also, how about this Pearl S. Buck-worthy headline, same issue:






